DSP-5 Export License Application Requirements

The purpose of the United States Department of State and the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC formerly PMDTC) is to regulate and protect the interests and security of the United States. This means that in order to ship items and technology overseas that may potentially jeopardize international security US companies must undergo a somewhat complicated regulatory process.

What does this really mean?

You are not allowed to ship a crate of rifles, a nuclear warhead, or technical schematics for the F-18 overseas without asking the government for permission.

Can I skip the “asking permission” part and just send a crate of night-vision goggles to Iran?

No. You can go to jail, subject yourself to massive fines, and be denied export privileges indefinitely if you don’t go through the system.

But we’ve never done this stuff before and we’ve been shipping our missile guidance systems overseas for years! What gives?

This situation is not unusual. Export controls have been in place for decades but have only recently been spotlighted for enforcement.

Many companies (even some of the big boys) have either intentionally ignored or have been negligently unaware of their responsibilities and have routinely violated US export policy. With export enforcement at the forefront of national security, the US government is cracking down and it is important to make export compliance a part of your business operation.

But I’m not shipping weapons of mass destruction or anything crazy like that! All I want to do is send a bunch of radio wiring harnesses to my customer in Europe. What do I have to do?

If your wiring harnesses are listed on the US Munitions List, you need to fill out a DSP-5 license application and send it to the Department of State for approval.

The DSP-5 license application covers the one time sale of controlled exports that will not be returning to the US. Something fairly benign like a wiring harness would only be listed if it was built exclusively for military use.

I forgot to mention that the wiring harnesses I’m shipping are for an encrypted communication system used by un-manned drone fighter aircraft. Is this important?

Um, yeah.

Note: to make things even more confusing, there is another agency, the US Department of Commerce, that regulates more common “dual-use” goods that have both military and civilian applications (like an avionics wiring harness).

This article is written as a reference to US Deparment of State controlled exports and the US Munitions List – not the US Department of Commerce.

How long does the regulatory process take?

A while. In my experience it can take anywhere from two weeks to two months. Longer if you’ve never done it before.

How do I get started?

Prior to filling out a DSP-5 license application, you need to:

  1. Register with the Department of State, DDTC.
  2. Identify the “empowered official” in your organization who will take responsibility for the export,
  3. Make sure you have the appropriate documentation (see ITAR Section 123.1),
  4. Make sure you qualify under all of the eligibility conditions listed in the basic certification statement (ITAR Section 126.13)
  5. Satisfy all the eligibility requirements of ITAR Sections 120.1(c) and (d) as well as 127.1(c) (where applicable),
  6. Identify your products on the U.S. Munitions List (USML; ITAR Part 121.

Is this a quick process?

No. If you haven’t started the application process make sure to build plenty of time into your delivery schedule so you can get all of the steps completed in time.

Once the above steps are complete, you can begin applying for a license. Complete the application form found in:

Guidelines for Completion of a Form DSP-5 Application, Request for Permanent Export of Unclassified Defense Articles and Related Unclassified Technical Data

13 Red Flag Indicators for Export Transactions

Exporters of military and dual-use goods are first and foremost business people, and sometimes have the habit of skipping over the crucial export compliance steps between making the sale and delivering the product to their buyer.

Most often the results of this practice are slowed delivery schedules, government fines, and even restrictions on future exports. The less tangible result, and one that I urge my customers to remember is the effect they might be having on the national security of the United States of America! With that in mind, here are a few red flag indicators you can keep in mind when dealing with overseas customers ordering controlled products:

13 Red Flag Indicators for Export Transactions

  1. The customer or its address is similar to one of the parties found on the Commerce Department’s [BIS’s] list of denied persons. Case example.
  2. The customer or purchasing agent is reluctant to offer information about the end-use of the item.
  3. The product’s capabilities do not fit the buyer’s line of business, such as an order for sophisticated computers for a small bakery.
  4. The item ordered is incompatible with the technical level of the country to which it is being shipped, such as semiconductor manufacturing equipment being shipped to a country that has no electronics industry.
  5. The customer is willing to pay cash for a very expensive item when the terms of sale would normally call for financing.
  6. The customer has little or no business background.
  7. The customer is unfamiliar with the product’s performance characteristics but still wants the product.
  8. Routine installation, training, or maintenance services are declined by the customer.
  9. Delivery dates are vague, or deliveries are planned for out of the way destinations.
  10. A freight forwarding firm is listed as the product’s final destination.
  11. The shipping route is abnormal for the product and destination.
  12. Packaging is inconsistent with the stated method of shipment or destination.
  13. When questioned, the buyer is evasive and especially unclear about whether the purchased product is for domestic use, for export, or for reexport.

If you have reason to believe a violation is taking place or has occurred, you may report it to the Department of Commerce by calling its 24 hour hot line number: 1 (800) 424-2980.

Export Compliance News Blurbs

Top Export Rules Headlines

Breaking Export Rules Blog News

Department of State Frequently Asked Questions

This guide contains answers to over 70 questions most often asked by exporters who are regulated by the Department of State and the US Government. It’s got useful advice, recommendations, technical answers, and more.

Get a Free Copy of the Deparment of State Frequently Asked Questions Now

Fill out the form below with your name and an email address and you will receive a copy of the FAQ in your email.

Get “The Department of State Frequently Asked Questions ” via Email

First Name
Last Name
Email


Among the frequently asked questions, you’ll find:


“Why do I need to get the U.S. Government’s approval to export and import defense articles and defense services?”

“How do I obtain approval before I export or import defense articles and defense services?”

“How do I know whether an article or service is controlled by the ITAR?”

“If I’m not sure what list my item is on, USML or CCL, how can I find out?”

“Who can apply for export or temporary import licenses?”

EAR, ITAR and EU Legal Compliance

  • Evaluation and Analysis
  • Governance
  • Documented Processes and Procedures
  • Analysis, Classification and Validation or product classification (ECCN) codes under ITAR/EAR and European Union legal guidelines
  • Risk Management
  • Active Products and Blocked Shipments
  • Customer contract fulfillment
  • Compliance
  • HEC and TEC Verification
  • Export Licensing Compliance and Management (SAP/GTS)
  • Export Compliance Manual Customization
  • International Consulting Company for Exporters

New ITAR Firearms Export Exemption in the Works

From ExportLawBlog: An article on the CTV website today revealed that

Canada is considering a change in its Export and Import Permits Act to permit exempt imports and exports by law enforcement officers when they cross the U.S.-Canada border in the course of their official duties. Significantly this is said to be part of a reciprocal arrangement with the United States, although the United States has yet to announce that it is considering such a reciprocal arrangement.  Read more…

Chinese Spies – Confessions of a Defector

From EpcohTimes

During his recent visit to Canada, Chen Yonglin the Chinese diplomat who defected in Australia pointed out that the Chinese embassies in North-America control and use the Chinese Student and Scholar Associations (CSSA) for ulterior motives such as spying. More and more evidence for this Chinese embassy’s control has surfaced lately.

Read More

Your See Through Rule Blues

Q: What is all the fuss about this See-Through Rule?  A: Let’s pretend you are Export Compliance SuperPerson with x-ray vision that can see through, say, an aircraft engine. Your uncanny sight can distinguish USML (United States Munitions List)  classified parts from commercial parts.  Let’s say you see a USML nut and bolt in there, but all else is commercial. Under the current interpretation of the See Through Rule, Export SuperPerson must now consider the entire engine as being  under the USML jurisdiction.   Or maybe not? This is the puzzling mud-pit known as the “See Through Rule”. Some call it “ITAR Creep” because of its slow moving and, well, creepy quicksand nature.  It is when one bad ITAR apple spoils the whole bunch.  

Brilliant analogies aside, the Rule considers products to be on the USML list if any part or component in the commercial dual use item is on the USML. 

While tight export restrictions can be a good thing when it comes to protecting US technology from smarmy evildoers, industry, particularly the military industrial complex, is up in arms:  “globalization” efforts and sales of dual use equipment to China are frozen since, as we all know, USML parts or their related technology can’t be sent there. It is also more costly, or even impossible to outsource production or to even export ITAR-tainted products for sale to other countries. Not to mention all that infected stuff out there was previously exported in more carefree days.

Thus, the industry argues, it will lose out against foreign competitors who aren’t impeded by Cold War era ITAR restrictions. So industry is still pushing for clarification of the see-through rule but the State Department won’t give it up just yet. A Big Chill was sent though the aeronautics industry a few years back when Boeing was fined $15 million because a USML classified QRS-11 navigation chip was included in a commercial engine exported for sale to China. 

 The question is: just how far will the See Through Rule be applied?  If State decides that the See Through Rule applies to all things, then there are lots of export violations floating around this planet which will be a world of bureaucratic hurt for US exporters.   JR 

U.S. UK Technology Transfer Agreement Reached

The UK Ministry of Defence has brokered a bilateral agreement with its US State Department that would relax technology transfer restrictions that threatened London’s continued participation in the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project. Read about it in Flight International USA

Report on Arms Export Compliance Violations

David Trimble, Director of Defense Trade Controls Compliance reports enforcement stats from February 2004 to February 2006:

  • $60 million in fines
  • 44 Debarments
  • 12 Companies over direct oversight through ongoing consent agreements
  • 459 Directed Disclosures

Keep up the good work. Here is a slide show you can use in putting your presentation programs together. Use it – you paid for it!

 – Zerbe